Skip to content

How we decide things

Research

Most "data-driven" companies cherry-pick a single example to justify what they already wanted to do. We try not to.

The methodology

For every meaningful decision (anything affecting business model, tech stack, or core feature):

Anti-patterns we avoid

Worked example

When deciding "should we be free for consumers and paid for B2B?":

  1. Found 3+ working examples (Navan, Replit, Slack)
  2. Found 3+ failing examples (Equals, xqa.io, Joovlin)
  3. Found disconfirming evidence (Andrew Chen's work on incentivized users)
  4. Built pros/cons matrix across 4 options
  5. Defined DMAI: free→paid conversion ≥5% by 90 days, support burden <10 tickets per 1000 free users/month, etc.
  6. Picked Hybrid (Option B), not Pure Free (Option A), even though Option A felt better, the data said it was riskier at indie scale

What we publish

Source code is private during early build. The strategic docs (decisions, research, validation evidence, business model analysis) are summarized on this site rather than exposed verbatim, since they contain partner pricing data and product roadmap details that aren't appropriate for full public release yet.